<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Humanizer on Automate everything </title>
		<link>https://graef.io/tags/humanizer/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Humanizer on Automate everything </description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en</language>
		
			<managingEditor>sebastian@graef.io (Sebastian Gräf)</managingEditor>
		
		
			<webMaster>sebastian@graef.io (Sebastian Gräf)</webMaster>
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 09:00:00 +1000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://graef.io/tags/humanizer/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>How to detect AI text, and how to humanise it (without lying)</title>
				<link>https://graef.io/how-to-detect-and-humanise-ai-text/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 09:00:00 +1000</pubDate><author>sebastian@graef.io (Sebastian Gräf)</author>
				<guid>https://graef.io/how-to-detect-and-humanise-ai-text/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;You wrote the post yourself. Sunday morning, two coffees, no assistant. On Monday a reader pastes it into an AI detector, it lights up red, and now you are in a comment thread defending your own sentences. Or the reverse: you used an LLM for a first draft and it reads like every other LLM draft, smooth, confident, and dead. Both problems have the same root, and neither is solved by the &amp;ldquo;undetectable AI humanizer&amp;rdquo; tools the internet keeps selling you.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
